SC on Stray Dogs: "Can't Read Mood to Bite," Focus on Institutional Safety

• Supreme Court emphasized difficulty in predicting stray dog behavior, stating "can't read when it is in the mood to bite."
• The court questioned the presence of stray dogs in sensitive institutional areas like schools, hospitals, and courts, advocating for their removal from such premises.
• A three-judge bench, including Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria, highlighted prevention as key due to the impossibility of identifying dangerous dogs by behavior.
• The modified order specifically targets institutional areas, distinguishing them from public roads, and aims to ensure safety from dog bites and accidents.
• Previous directives included relocating stray canines from institutional areas to shelters for sterilization and vaccination, with subsequent release to their original pick-up spots, excluding rabid dogs.

Why It Matters: Supreme Court prioritizes safety in institutional areas, advocating for removal of stray dogs due to unpredictable behavior and accident risks.