Supreme Court Reserves Verdict on Harish Rana's End-of-Life Plea

• The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment on a plea by Harish Rana's family to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for their son, who has been in a permanent vegetative state since 2013.
• Harish Rana, 31, suffered severe head injuries and quadriplegia after a fall in 2013, leaving him bedridden and fully dependent on artificial life support.
• The court emphasized the need for the family's decision to be stable, deliberate, and consistent, not driven by momentary emotion.
• Medical boards have concluded that treatment can be discontinued, and 'nature should be allowed to take its own course,' as there is no chance of recovery for Rana.
• The case highlights the ongoing debate on end-of-life care and dignity in India, with the family seeking relief from prolonged suffering.

Why It Matters: Supreme Court reserves verdict on Harish Rana's end-of-life plea, sparking debate on dignity and care.