Trump's "ended wars" are fragile deals, not lasting peace.

• President Trump's claims of "ending eight wars" are under scrutiny, with critics arguing his approach prioritizes transactional dealmaking over lasting peace.
• Many of Trump's touted ceasefires have proven fragile or led to renewed conflict, such as the DRC/Rwanda and Thailand/Cambodia agreements.
• Foreign policy analysts suggest Trump's "inherently transactional" model is ill-suited for complex conflict resolution.
• Some agreements cited by the administration involved disputes that were inactive or had limited direct US intervention, like India/Pakistan and Israel/Hamas.
• The article implies Trump's claims are more about achieving diplomatic "wins" than resolving actual violence, citing examples like Serbia/Kosovo and Egypt/Ethiopia.

Why It Matters: Trump's "peace deals" are fragile, leading to renewed conflict, not lasting peace.