'Core Five' Global Governance Idea: A Dangerous Mirage, Not a Solution

• The "Core Five" (US, China, Russia, India, Japan) proposal for global governance is critiqued as a flawed "mirage" despite claims of pragmatic management for systemic transition.
• Excluding the EU, a central node in global trade, finance, and regulation, creates parallel processes lacking implementation power and ignores its structural capacity.
• The C5 assumes unrealistic great-power convergence, overlooking deep, defining disputes like US-China rivalry and Sino-Indian tensions that cannot be easily set aside.
• The proposal risks instrumentalizing India, reducing it to a mere "balancer" and constraining its autonomous foreign policy and engagement with other global partners.
• A self-selected C5 lacks legitimacy, excludes major regions, and could worsen global instability by being perceived as an elite cartel, potentially hollowing out existing institutions.

Why It Matters: Global stability needs inclusive governance and repaired trust, not exclusive "Core Five" clubs.