Supreme Court Reprimands Elvish Yadav in Snake Venom Case

• Supreme Court severely reprimands YouTuber Elvish Yadav in the snake venom case, highlighting his role as a 'public figure'.
• Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh questioned if a famous person can use animals for popularity, comparing it to playing with zoo animals.
• The Court emphasized that using 'mute victims' like snakes is a legal offense and that popularity doesn't grant the right to disregard laws.
• Elvish Yadav's lawyer argued he was only present for a video shoot and that examined snakes were not venomous, with no evidence of prohibited substances.
• The Court prioritized wildlife protection and societal moral impact over defense arguments, ensuring the investigation under the Wildlife (Protection) Act continues.